<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Response to &#8220;Accept Help&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/</link> <description>Finance is not rocket science, unless it is government finance.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 22:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Carnival of the Capitalists</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-142</link> <dc:creator>rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Carnival of the Capitalists</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-142</guid> <description>[...] submitted a slightly better entry (than last week)to this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Capitalists. Hope you enjoy reading it. I also found some [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] submitted a slightly better entry (than last week)to this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Capitalists. Hope you enjoy reading it. I also found some [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Capitalists</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-73</link> <dc:creator>rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Capitalists</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:12:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-73</guid> <description>[...] than some of the other carnivals and festivals in the blogosphere. I was happy to see them include A Response to &#8216;Accept Help&#8217; - somewhat of a feeble post as I look back on it - but I was happy to get on the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than some of the other carnivals and festivals in the blogosphere. I was happy to see them include A Response to &#8216;Accept Help&#8217; &#8211; somewhat of a feeble post as I look back on it &#8211; but I was happy to get on the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: plonkee</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-60</link> <dc:creator>plonkee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:21:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-60</guid> <description>It depends how you define socialist. If you mean communist, then that is true in the majority of communist nations (although it wasn&#039;t true in the Soviet Union for example). On the other hand, if you mean like European socialist, then, er, no the poor don&#039;t suffer from starvation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends how you define socialist. If you mean communist, then that is true in the majority of communist nations (although it wasn&#8217;t true in the Soviet Union for example). On the other hand, if you mean like European socialist, then, er, no the poor don&#8217;t suffer from starvation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 20 Year Olds Reading the Wall Street Journal?</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-59</link> <dc:creator>rocket finance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 20 Year Olds Reading the Wall Street Journal?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:31:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-59</guid> <description>[...] I am falling into the same trap and speaking from 20/20 hindsight. . . Anyway, even though we do not see eye to eye on politics, plonkee got me thinking about how every financial product under the sun is marketed to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am falling into the same trap and speaking from 20/20 hindsight. . . Anyway, even though we do not see eye to eye on politics, plonkee got me thinking about how every financial product under the sun is marketed to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-57</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:51:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-57</guid> <description>Culture and society can be compassionate. Governments do not exist for compassion. I don&#039;t believe that government handouts equal compassion. It seems to me that progressives like taxes and entitlements by way of the government because it absolves them of guilt over the poor without having to do something about the poor themselves. They would rather help the poor through legislation than through privately run charities.
The gap between the rich and poor is greater in socialist countries. Furthermore the standard of living among the poor in a capitalistic society is far greater than that of a socialist nation. The poor in the US suffer from obesity and have cable tv. The poor in most socialist nations suffer from starvation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Culture and society can be compassionate. Governments do not exist for compassion. I don&#8217;t believe that government handouts equal compassion. It seems to me that progressives like taxes and entitlements by way of the government because it absolves them of guilt over the poor without having to do something about the poor themselves. They would rather help the poor through legislation than through privately run charities.</p><p>The gap between the rich and poor is greater in socialist countries. Furthermore the standard of living among the poor in a capitalistic society is far greater than that of a socialist nation. The poor in the US suffer from obesity and have cable tv. The poor in most socialist nations suffer from starvation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: plonkee</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-56</link> <dc:creator>plonkee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:15:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-56</guid> <description>I believe that the standard of living is higher in Scandinavia - I&#039;m sure they have problems with poverty, drug abuse and homelessness. I will merely state that they are happier, and being happy is a good thing.
There is always a tension in European countries between the political left and right wings and it tends to be quite cyclical. I can&#039;t imagine any European country completely abandoning its welfare state - in the UK (not a very socialist country on the whole) certain aspects are sacrosanct even amongst the right wing.
For a wealthy country, there is a large disparity between rich and poor in the States so its no wonder that you still have poverty. Oh, and IMHO government is representative of society, not somehow separate. I want my society to be compassionate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the standard of living is higher in Scandinavia &#8211; I&#8217;m sure they have problems with poverty, drug abuse and homelessness. I will merely state that they are happier, and being happy is a good thing.</p><p>There is always a tension in European countries between the political left and right wings and it tends to be quite cyclical. I can&#8217;t imagine any European country completely abandoning its welfare state &#8211; in the UK (not a very socialist country on the whole) certain aspects are sacrosanct even amongst the right wing.</p><p>For a wealthy country, there is a large disparity between rich and poor in the States so its no wonder that you still have poverty. Oh, and IMHO government is representative of society, not somehow separate. I want my society to be compassionate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-54</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:25:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-54</guid> <description>Perhaps the prediction of a dictatorship is too extreme, however I can see that thought and speech are becoming more and more restricted in our society every day.
It is my understanding that Scandinavia is moving way from socialism and more toward a capitalistic type society. Furthermore, does Scandinavia have less of a problem with poverty, drug abuse and homelessness than the US or UK?
I live in what is often termed the &quot;wealthiest nation on the earth&quot;, yet we still have poverty and homelessness. I think that it lend strength to the prophecy made by Christ when he said: “For you always have the poor with you&quot;.
I am certainly not against charity and compassion. I just do not think that those areas are the proper role of government.
I think I feel another post coming. . .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the prediction of a dictatorship is too extreme, however I can see that thought and speech are becoming more and more restricted in our society every day.</p><p>It is my understanding that Scandinavia is moving way from socialism and more toward a capitalistic type society. Furthermore, does Scandinavia have less of a problem with poverty, drug abuse and homelessness than the US or UK?</p><p>I live in what is often termed the &#8220;wealthiest nation on the earth&#8221;, yet we still have poverty and homelessness. I think that it lend strength to the prophecy made by Christ when he said: “For you always have the poor with you&#8221;.</p><p>I am certainly not against charity and compassion. I just do not think that those areas are the proper role of government.</p><p>I think I feel another post coming. . .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: plonkee</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-53</link> <dc:creator>plonkee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-53</guid> <description>Naturally, I&#039;m not opposed to some redistribution of wealth, in effect giving some people who have been handicapped by circumstances a fair shot at the competition. For this reason I agree with state-funded education, lots of support for people trying to get into employment.
In other cases, I think that a civilised country doesn&#039;t have people living on the street, or people suffering because they are too poor to get medical care. I don&#039;t live in a civilised country yet, but we are getting there.
Countries that have strong wefare systems (think Scandinavia) are some of the happiest in the world, and I&#039;d rather be happy than rich.
Finally, in the UK at least the people most likely to get government help are those who have the lowest income, they are simultaneously least likely to vote. I don&#039;t think that its the end of democracy (if that&#039;s how you&#039;d describe either of our political systems).
In rebuttal to Alexander Tyler - I&#039;m not sure he&#039;d ever even witnessed democracy so why is he likely to be right. I see neither the USA nor the UK, (nor any other major industrialised democratic nation) becoming dictatorships anytime soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, I&#8217;m not opposed to some redistribution of wealth, in effect giving some people who have been handicapped by circumstances a fair shot at the competition. For this reason I agree with state-funded education, lots of support for people trying to get into employment.</p><p>In other cases, I think that a civilised country doesn&#8217;t have people living on the street, or people suffering because they are too poor to get medical care. I don&#8217;t live in a civilised country yet, but we are getting there.</p><p>Countries that have strong wefare systems (think Scandinavia) are some of the happiest in the world, and I&#8217;d rather be happy than rich.</p><p>Finally, in the UK at least the people most likely to get government help are those who have the lowest income, they are simultaneously least likely to vote. I don&#8217;t think that its the end of democracy (if that&#8217;s how you&#8217;d describe either of our political systems).</p><p>In rebuttal to Alexander Tyler &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;d ever even witnessed democracy so why is he likely to be right. I see neither the USA nor the UK, (nor any other major industrialised democratic nation) becoming dictatorships anytime soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trent Hamm</title><link>http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-52</link> <dc:creator>Trent Hamm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocketfinance.net/2007/10/11/a-response-to-accept-help/#comment-52</guid> <description>I agree with Plonkee, actually, that someone eligible for a benefit shoudl take it.  However, I also agree with you that there&#039;s something inherently wrong with the system when it takes from hard working people and redistributes it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Plonkee, actually, that someone eligible for a benefit shoudl take it.  However, I also agree with you that there&#8217;s something inherently wrong with the system when it takes from hard working people and redistributes it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
